STORY BYSilver fillings, or amalgams as dentists refer to them, are made of alloy that usually contains combinations of silver, copper, tin and mercury. So when the media start talking about the dangers of mercury, amalgam is almost always mentioned as a possible source of mercury poisoning in humans, a claim which is absolutely false, according to dental professionals.
An article in the Feb.10 New York Times reported that the United Nations environmental conference held in Nairobi, Kenya called for a world-wide crackdown on mercury pollution. That same story went on to list various sources, including silver fillings, which expose humans to the highly toxic heavy metal.
But the claim that mercury in amalgam causes mercury poisoning, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and multiple sclerosis or other neurological diseases is simply misleading, says dentist and clinical assistant professor of the Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, Cynthia Trajtenberg, of the University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston.
“Amalgams have been around for more than 100 years, because amalgam is an excellent restorative material,” Trajtenberg says. “There is no scientific evidence of a connection between neurological or other diseases and the use of amalgam. The removal of amalgam does not cure or prevent any of those diseases or other diseases.”
Her statement is backed by numerous medical organizations including the American Dental Association, Alzheimer’s Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Autism Society of America, and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. They all agree that there is no link between silver fillings and mercury toxicity causing neurological diseases.
A June 4, 1998, editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine says there is no evidence linking dental amalgams to health concerns, such as coronary heart disease and multiple sclerosis and that after extensive investigation researchers concluded “that dental amalgams do not pose a serious health risk.”
Last fall, the American Dental Association (ADA) released a statement that said “Dental amalgam (silver filling) is considered a safe, affordable and durable material that has been used to restore the teeth of more than 100 million Americans.”
Despite evidence showing that dental amalgams are safe, some patients insist on having all the amalgams removed, Trajtenberg says. She recently encountered just such a patient at the Dental Branch’s clinic. The patient’s physician told her to remove all metals from her mouth to eliminate exposure to mercury.
“The physician told the patient something that is not scientifically based and the patient believed it,” Trajtenberg says. “That physician was misinformed and created fear and anxiety in the patient.”
Saying that the mercury in amalgam can cause harm is a little like saying the chloride in table salt can kill you. Shaking pure chloride on a juicy T-bone steak or over a tofu salad is a bad idea. The chemical will ruin the food, and force a scene as you spit out the offensive muck.
But combine the chloride with just the right amount of sodium and you create the tasty flavor enhancer called table salt.
The mercury in silver fillings is not harmful because the mercury is transformed in the process of making an alloy much like sodium and chloride are completely transformed when combined to make table salt.
“Amalgam is made by mixing mercury with other metals, such as silver, copper and tin,” Trajtenberg says. “The mercury binds to the other metals to make a stable alloy, and therefore is safe for dental applications.”
Amalgam is so popular because it is so stable and tough, surviving more than 30 years in the jaws of life. On the other hand, composite fillings last only about seven years. For the oral health of the general public, amalgam fillings certainly have been cost-effective.
In the 90s, there was an attempt to replace the mercury in amalgams with gallium, a rare metallic element. Gallium was tested in large part because of the public’s unfounded concerns about mercury in fillings, Trajtenberg says. But gallium showed more wear than fillings made with mercury. Dentists eventually abandoned gallium as an alternative to mercury.
Silver fillings do have one main downside. They are not aesthetically pleasing, so amalgams are not used on the front teeth simply because they aren’t attractive.
And German dental researchers have reported rare allergic reactions to mercury, but Trajtenberg says she never has seen an allergic reaction in her 10 years of clinical practice. She points out that an allergic reaction to an alloy is not the same as being poisoned by mercury. And mercury is not the only metal to cause allergies. In rare cases, some patients have even reported allergies to noble metals such as gold.
“The selection of the dental material should be something chosen between the patient and the dentist,” Trajtenberg says. But the dentist has the responsibility to tell the patient the benefits and drawbacks of each different material, including how long it lasts and how much it costs. “When I see patients, I tell them the benefits of having certain materials in the mouth but also the limitations,” she says.
Trajtenberg practices what she preaches. She recently replaced an amalgam that had been in her mouth since she was eight years old with a new mercury-based amalgam. “I personally chose amalgam over other dental options because it is a very good restorative material when it is properly placed,” she says.
Trajtenberg advises anyone concerned about amalgams to read the ADA literature on the subject and talk to your dentist.
Last Updated: 3-17-2003Editorial Board | Legal Disclaimer | Privacy & Security | Contact Us
© 2000-2010 Office of Institutional Advancement, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Follow us on:
Dr. Cynthia Trajtenberg is a clinical assistant professor of the Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials at the UT Dental School.
See Dr. Trajtenberg also at:
Eating healthy
reverses metabolic syndrome
Dr. Tasnime Akbaraly of University College London and her colleagues were interested if healthy eating could actually turn-the-tide and reverse metabolic syndrome, which is having 3 or more of the following risk factors: excess abdominal fat; high triglycerides, hypertension, low levels of HDL the “good” cholesterol, or type 2 diabetes. Having metabolic syndrome doubles a persons’ risk of heart disease and greatly increases the odds of developing type 2 diabetes.
The researchers studied 339 British civil servants with metabolic syndrome, and how closely the adhered to the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) to see if it could help reverse metabolic syndrome. The AHEI is a set of published nutritional guidelines by the Harvard School of Public Health in 2002 that emphasizes whole grains, fruits, vegetables and decreased red meat consumption.
Five years into the study, nearly 50% no longer had metabolic syndrome. People who followed the AHEI guidelines the closest were nearly twice as likely to have reversed their metabolic syndrome. The results of the study were published in Diabetes Care, online July 29, 2010.
Dr. Alice Lichtenstein, an expert on diet and heart health from Tufts University in Boston who was not involved in the study said, "It's not about focusing on individual components of the diet, it's really the whole package, and that becomes important because it means that if one of the components of a healthy diet is to eat more fruits and vegetables, just buying a pill saying that there's a concentrated extract of fruits and vegetables is probably not what's going to help you."
Call and make an appointment with Wellness Coach Sam Hester, CWC, CPT, LWMC, at 713-500-3327. It's confidential and free. For more information on the wellness services provided, visit UT Counseling and WorkLife Services.
